galenrog wrote:I think you sell yourself short. Copper is a small thing. It can add up, but is still a small thing. Errors and varieties, even on newer cents, can be quite valuable to collectors. Die cracks being just one thing that can help your bottom line.
A few years ago I was the recipient of a box of 2018 nickels. As I examined them, disappointed that there were no older coins, I noticed that several had the same die crack. When done with that box of two thousand coins, I had over fifty showing the same crack, but is slightly different states of progression.
After putting them in order from least to greatest, I admired the collection for a few months before putting the info out to those who might be interested. Having a database of over 5000 collectors, that was a fun exercise.
A few weeks later, I sold the lot for just under $700.
Just one example of how errors can be worth far more than copper.
Time for more coffee.
I agree that I sell myself short. The copper/zinc sorting is easy with the Ryedale, however critically examining each coin takes a lot of time. The eye, neck and back strain can be brutal for older hoarders like me. I need 3x reading glasses just to see the date. I've woken up plenty of times with major neck pain, not fun.
Right now I have two full 5 gal buckets of zincs. I'm not dumping or getting rid of any of them. IMO, soon the mints will stop producing pennies (i.e. Canada), then nickels, then all change.
I've been examining coins/change since the late 70's. I found a few rare errors since then. A found a 1972 double-die 20 years ago, I put it somewhere for safe keeping, but I cannot remember where that 'safe' spot is.
I recently found a reverse 1909 die cap error... I wonder what that thing is worth?
Time is precious, stop wasting it.
