Realcent.org

Shame you didn't win.....and yes Pics of pretty coins are always in order.

Want!

Bad

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1924-NGC-MS64-C ... 0757647225

That peace dollar is obviously artificially toned.

I would stay away from it if I were you.

barrytrot wrote:That peace dollar is obviously artificially toned.

I would stay away from it if I were you.

Is there a sure shot way of identifying artificially toned coins? I can't tell the difference if my life dependent on it

Will appreciate any info. Thanks!

There is a pretty sure way, but it's not an exact science.

A coin like above where it has CLEAR red blotchiness with the outside looking "burned" is the reason this one is 100% guaranteed to be artificial.

Thanks Barry. I guess it will come with experience. But have to start somewhere

barrytrot wrote:There is a pretty sure way, but it's not an exact science.

A coin like above where it has CLEAR red blotchiness with the outside looking "burned" is the reason this one is 100% guaranteed to be artificial.

+1 Toning should also change with elevation. (The raised letters should be a different color than the surrounding field)

barrytrot wrote:That peace dollar is obviously artificially toned.

I would stay away from it if I were you.

I thought they had to note that?

And I don't have any play money right now in that range, sticking under 75$ for right now, but thanks for looking out

Oakair wrote:

barrytrot wrote:That peace dollar is obviously artificially toned.

I would stay away from it if I were you.

I thought they had to note that?

And I don't have any play money right now in that range, sticking under 75$ for right now, but thanks for looking out

Most sellers will sell coins in NGC or PCGS as "good coins" regardless.

And greattoning is a reasonable seller (although I'm a prolific buyer and I've never bought from them) but obviously they aren't a GREAT seller. No GREAT seller would EVER deal with a coin that is clearly artificial!

Just got this one back from PCGS. MS-66. For my personal collection.

Rodebaugh wrote:Just got this one back from PCGS. MS-66. For my personal collection.

Green with envy --------------->>>

barrytrot wrote:There is a pretty sure way, but it's not an exact science.

A coin like above where it has CLEAR red blotchiness with the outside looking "burned" is the reason this one is 100% guaranteed to be artificial.

Why would a grading company Not note that? They seem to note about everything else on those little holders...

Color in PCGS Plastic. My submit, Just got it back.

Rodebaugh wrote:Color in PCGS Plastic. My submit, Just got it back.

She's a looker!

Some recent purchases:

A buffalo I just purchased:

Nice buff. Barry do you get them trueviewd or buy um that way?

Rodebaugh wrote:Nice buff. Barry do you get them trueviewd or buy um that way?

I bought all of these that way. But all my coins will eventually be TrueViewed as I like symmetry And, of course, the best photos are of the naked coin

It's only $10/coin now, which is a great deal. I thought it was reasonable at $20

barrytrot wrote:

Rodebaugh wrote:Nice buff. Barry do you get them trueviewd or buy um that way?

I bought all of these that way. But all my coins will eventually be TrueViewed as I like symmetry And, of course, the best photos are of the naked coin

It's only $10/coin now, which is a great deal. I thought it was reasonable at $20

Yeah 10 bones ain't bad for the TrVu....but you have to pay reholder fees. Also, some of my super sexy coins live in some of my more collectable older holders.

I should give it a try sometime with some of my newer holders.

I like to re-holder into the PCGS-Secure anyway so that would already be done most of the time.

I have very few "collectible holders" and even those I'll likely re-holder one day since, again, I like symmetry.

Trueview....to heck with truview. Some of my ASEs prof photographed.

Some recent Silver Eagles. I had to keep up with Rodebaugh

This first one is my all time favorite Silver Eagle with it's unique striped toning on both sides!

barrytrot wrote:I like to re-holder into the PCGS-Secure anyway so that would already be done most of the time.

I have very few "collectible holders" and even those I'll likely re-holder one day since, again, I like symmetry.

HaHa, I like 'symmetry' too, but I call it OCD in my case.

I know most people prefer PCGS, but I prefer the look of the NGC holders. I don't have anything truly valuable though.

Another new purchase that has a great look!

taking a guess then going to lookup: PR66