Page 1 of 1

1947 dot 5¢

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 7:15 am
by Morsecode
I recently purchased a small lot of .999 nickel and found two of the 47 dot variety in the batch. Then, yesterday, I wrangled a 2005 edition of "Coins of Canada" out of a local coin shop and was surprised to see the Dot valued so highly...$25/F12, $40/VF20, $90/EF40...

Can they really be so uncommon if I plucked two from a random group of less than $20 fv?

Not concerned with the actual real world pricing; I assume this guide is similar to our Redbook and primarily useful as a population report.

Do you Canadian nickel guys find them regularly?

Re: 1947 dot 5¢

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 7:37 am
by jello_g
I've never come across one in circulation in all these years. You are very lucky.

Re: 1947 dot 5¢

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 8:20 am
by henrysmedford
Could one of them are both been a 47 Maple leaf, Also I do not know why but Whitman does not have a hole for the 47 dot 5 cent but the do for the 1936 Dot cent.a coin with five know. For price info on your 47 see https://www.jandm.com/script/getitem.asp?CID=3&PID=86 Joe
ImageImage Image Image

Re: 1947 dot 5¢

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:32 am
by Morsecode
No, they're dots for sure. I found about a dozen of the leafs in the same batch. The dots are lower and much closer to the 7.

I was hoping to find a '43 or '44, then realized those are not nickel :?

Would like to buy a nice BU of either year since they have Morsecode on the reverse ;)

Re: 1947 dot 5¢

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:09 am
by jello_g
I got some 43's and 44's in BU... LMK if you want to trade one of your dots. Do you have pictures?

Re: 1947 dot 5¢

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 4:26 pm
by Morsecode
I'm high bidder on a '44 right now, so not ready to trade until that plays out...but here's a pic (best I can do with the cellphone). I'd say both coins are equal in grade & eye appeal. VF? Better? Worse?...

Image

The guide only gives grading points for "hair above the ear" on the obverse, and not too specific at that. Not sure what VF: 'Where hair not worn, hair is clear but not sharp' means. If the coin were US I'd call it XF or better.

Re: 1947 dot 5¢

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 5:02 pm
by Morsecode
This nice '38 was in the same group

Image

Re: 1947 dot 5¢

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 7:20 pm
by mtalbot_ca
Congrats,

I have never found one in over 2,000$ FV of nickels.

Cheers,

Re: 1947 dot 5¢

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:55 pm
by frugalcanuck
Nice coin. Im in the 0 for category for the 47 dot as well

Nice coin

Re: 1947 dot 5¢

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:48 pm
by didou
Great find !

$115/EF40 $200/AU50 $275/AU55 $325/MS60 $2500/MS66
according to the 2011 Charlton, there is no price for grade lower than ef-40

Re: 1947 dot 5¢

PostPosted: Sun Jun 30, 2013 9:05 pm
by Morsecode
Found my third "dot" this weekend on a TD counter magnet

Image

Re: 1947 dot 5¢

PostPosted: Sun Jun 30, 2013 9:35 pm
by henrysmedford

Re: 1947 dot 5¢

PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2015 8:08 am
by henrysmedford
We found one today in a batch of Canadian 1 and five cent coins we got from the coin shop at a .75 of face. And we get to fill a hole in our new album!
Image

Re: 1947 dot 5¢

PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2015 1:56 am
by Recyclersteve
I've looked through many thousands of Canadian nickels (the .999 type) and I think in all those nickels I found one 47 dot.

Re: 1947 dot 5¢

PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:59 am
by NHsorter
Sorry about going off topic kinda, but how can you tell if you have a 1951 high relief? I don't know what to look for.

Re: 1947 dot 5¢

PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2015 7:22 am
by Verbane
NHsorter wrote:Sorry about going off topic kinda, but how can you tell if you have a 1951 high relief? I don't know what to look for.




Courtesy J&M coin: https://www.jandm.com/script/getcatalog.asp
25-1951-hr-lr.jpg
25-1951-hr-lr.jpg (16.98 KiB) Viewed 2469 times

Re: 1947 dot 5¢

PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2015 7:50 am
by NHsorter
Dang, it's like the 1965 Large Beads. I have searched a ton for those. Never any luck and it's a major squinter of a job too. Not the most fun error to look for.