no more frontrunning from the fed....

[John_doe]

well maybe they will, but we will have a lot more eyes on it now.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/ron- ... 36757.html

[John_doe]

what is beyond me is that 97 democrats voted against it. must be getting some kickbacks.


even miff rumney voted for it. i may have to register to vote for the first time in my life. thanks miff.

[natsb88]

Still has to pass the Senate, and Reid is determined to kill it. In fact, all but one of the "no" votes were democrats. I guess they really don't want people to know the full scope and extent of the Fed's bailouts and money-printing...

[John_doe]

Still has to pass the Senate, and Reid is determined to kill it. In fact, all but one of the "no" votes were democrats. I guess they really don't want people to know the full scope and extent of the Fed's bailouts and money-printing...

or even worse, their international balance sheet.

they don't us to see the hussein trust fund they set up, or the osama bail outs.

[John_doe]

Still has to pass the Senate, and Reid is determined to kill it. In fact, all but one of the "no" votes were democrats. I guess they really don't want people to know the full scope and extent of the Fed's bailouts and money-printing...

we have m1 and m2 statistics already (if they are accurate), although they have nixed the m3 statistic.the international balance sheet is what im interested in. this is where the voids are showing up in fed reporting. fishy to say the very least.