68Camaro wrote:Maybe, but Roberts is starting to look like a nutcase himself.
68Camaro wrote:There isn't an *inconsistency* in the underlined. It's a product of paranoid conspiracy fed by people that don't understand that just because something is large and expensive doesn't mean that there aren't fatal design flaws that make it uniquely susceptible to what happened.
The space shuttle had two (that we know about). They happen.
theo wrote:I agree.
I was just surprised to learn that a plane with thousands of pounds of jet fuel hitting a building containing all manner of flammable material would cause "a low temperature, short-lived fire."
Return to Economic & Business News, Reports, and Predictions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests