Page 1 of 1

Why Isn't This News?

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 10:11 am
by beauanderos
Several federal agencies, including the Department of Defense, confirmed efficacy of nanosilver solution.

By Ethan A. Huff
Global Research, October 03, 2014
Natural News 25 September 2014
Region: sub-Saharan Africa
Theme: Science and Medicine
ebola-virus

Efforts to bring natural Ebola treatments to suffering West Africans have been squelched by the World Health Organization (WHO), which recently blocked multiple shipments of nanosilver solution measuring at 10 parts per million (ppm) from entering the region, leaving thousands to suffer needlessly.

WHO officials also reportedly called off a trial at an Ebola isolation ward where local health authorities were set to begin administering the silver, which the U.S. government previously demonstrated is highly effective against Ebola. WHO ordered the trial not to proceed despite the fact that it had earlier voiced support for experimental treatments.

Both WHO and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have given their blessing to experimental therapies for Ebola, citing a lack of proven treatment options. But when it comes to using therapeutic silver, all bets are off, it seems.

Authorities block small shipment of nanosilver three times

According to the Natural Solutions Foundation (NSF), efforts to ship nanosilver into Sierra Leone have thus far failed. The organization has been trying to deliver a shipment of 200 bottles of nanosilver 10 ppm, and 100 tubes of nanosilver gel, to no avail. At this point, the shipment has been returned to the U.S. for the third time.

“That parcel, shipped Air Express at a cost of $3400 to Sierra Leone on August 20, never made it out of Paris,” reads an NSF action alert. “Air France has yet to find a reason for that. But it made its way back to the US again, apparently for the 3rd time without being delivered to Africa.”

People are dying, and bureaucrats are still playing politics with silver

Formerly classified documents obtained from the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) reveal that antimicrobial silver solutions like the kind NSF is trying to deliver to Africa have proven benefits in fighting Ebola and other forms of hemorrhagic fever. Research conducted by the DOD and several other federal agencies back in 2008 confirmed this, though health regulators largely ignored it.

A presentation entitled “Silver Nanoparticles Neutralize Hemorrhagic Fever Viruses,” which revealed exactly what its name suggests, was buried and kept secret for years. In essence, investigators determined that simple silver solutions neutralize viruses like Arenavirus and Filovirus, both of which are related to Ebola.

Interestingly, the research was conducted with the backing of the DOD’s Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) and the U.S. Strategic Command Center for Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction. The presentation was given by researchers from the Applied Biotechnology Branch, 711th Human Performance Wing of the Air Force Research Laboratory.

But not a single mainstream media outlet reported on the presentation, and to this day its findings have been largely ignored by establishment health authorities. Sadly, this political quagmire — nanosilver is an obvious threat to pharmaceutical interests, and thus is being marginalized — is resulting in thousands of needless deaths in West Africa with no end in sight.

Contact your representatives and demand that nanosilver be used in Africa

NSF is calling on 10 million people to write their representatives and demand that clinical trials be conducted on nanosilver in Africa. The group says doctors and nurses need nanosilver to protect themselves, and patients need it to overcome the disease. Recommended dosages for each application are available at the following link; at the bottom of this page, you can also contact your representatives by inputting your zip code:
SalsaLabs.com.

Sources:

http://org.salsalabs.com

http://thesilveredge.com

http://www.npr.org

http://science.naturalnews.com


http://www.globalresearch.ca/world-heal ... ca/5406002

Re: Why Isn't This News?

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 11:17 am
by Z00
I read the same report.
The reason it is not news is very simple.

Big pharma can't profit from a patent on nano or colloidal silver.

It's always been about money.

EDIT: I use a colloidal silver gel on cuts and scrapes and bug bites. It is almost miraculous. It cools, stops the itch and starts to heal overnight.

Re: Why Isn't This News?

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 9:44 pm
by Hawkeye
Z00 wrote:I read the same report.
The reason it is not news is very simple.

Big pharma can't profit from a patent on nano or colloidal silver.

It's always been about money.

EDIT: I use a colloidal silver gel on cuts and scrapes and bug bites. It is almost miraculous. It cools, stops the itch and starts to heal overnight.



That is exactly what I told my wife when she read that report and asked why they weren't getting it to everyone.

Re: Why Isn't This News?

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 9:56 pm
by silverflake
Crazy. I can tell you from a pharmacists point of view (me), we dispense silvadene cream (generic = silver sulfadiazine) for topical wounds/infections daily at the hospital I work at. Its especially effective on severe burn wounds. Also, infections get treated with silvasorb. Silver rocks.

Also, a few years ago I remember a report in the Journal of Nano-technology that in-vitro tests show that silver nano-particles prevent HIV from dividing.

These people need to open their eyes.

Re: Why Isn't This News?

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 10:28 pm
by Morsecode
silverflake wrote:Crazy. I can tell you from a pharmacists point of view (me), we dispense silvadene cream (generic = silver sulfadiazine)


Is there a brand name for this I might find at a Walgreens or other drugstore?

Re: Why Isn't This News?

PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 1:15 am
by Rosco
Morsecode wrote:
silverflake wrote:Crazy. I can tell you from a pharmacists point of view (me), we dispense silvadene cream (generic = silver sulfadiazine)


Is there a brand name for this I might find at a Walgreens or other drugstore?


:mrgreen: I also would like to try this at 77 how much harm can it do to me ;)

Re: Why Isn't This News?

PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 1:50 am
by beauanderos
after spending about four hours yesterday reading the included links... I went ahead and ordered my own colloidal silver generator. I had already been using
bottled stuff purchased a few years ago... making my own will be much cheaper. I view it as another prep that would be very handy to have access to at
home... and if, indeed, it turns out that colloidal silver IS efficacious against ebola... AND ebola becomes widespread... cost is going to SOAR on colloidal
silver solutions online. As an RN I can tell you... that if at least one tenth of the testimonials that people have posted are legitimate... then it is worth giving
this stuff a shot. It would be just like Big Pharma to block something like this.

Beat the rush, folks :thumbup: :clap: :lol:

Image

Re: Why Isn't This News?

PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 2:14 am
by beauanderos
btw... the only things I've seen written about Ebola claim that it is only spread via contact with bodily fluids.

So... what about flies? Bodies draw flies, flies contact them and then land upon other surfaces? Contaminating them??
Am I missing something here? :shock:

Re: Why Isn't This News?

PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:00 am
by Z00
If anyone is interested, this is what I was referring to above.

http://silvermiracles.com/colloidalsilvergel.htm

At 75 ppm (parts per million) it is one of the stronger solutions and I just looked and it is on sale right now.