Engineer wrote:I'm waiting for police to realize they can seize armored cars from banks. Doing so would force the banksters to prove the money wouldn't be used for things like rigging markets, money laundering, supporting terrorism, or used fraudulently for stuff like Linda Green mortgages.
Recyclersteve wrote:Whatever happened to "innocent until proven guilty"?
messymessy wrote:Engineer wrote:I'm waiting for police to realize they can seize armored cars from banks. Doing so would force the banksters to prove the money wouldn't be used for things like rigging markets, money laundering, supporting terrorism, or used fraudulently for stuff like Linda Green mortgages.
Problem is that banks can afford good lawyers. The common man that is getting abused by forfeiture "laws" can not.
Engineer wrote:messymessy wrote:Engineer wrote:I'm waiting for police to realize they can seize armored cars from banks. Doing so would force the banksters to prove the money wouldn't be used for things like rigging markets, money laundering, supporting terrorism, or used fraudulently for stuff like Linda Green mortgages.
Problem is that banks can afford good lawyers. The common man that is getting abused by forfeiture "laws" can not.
True enough, but the point is forcing them to fight in local courts rather than their established crony network.
If sheriffs across the country decided to shut down the more egregious banks via forfeiture laws, perhaps the balance of power could be restored.
Return to Economic & Business News, Reports, and Predictions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests