It's a horrible idea, on the "individual to individual" level I imagine some debtors
would "disappear" after they give their creditors the finger.
I think everyone remember's "that guy" in junior high who always begged to borrow
what he could off anyone he could then made it a massive hassle when it was time
to pay back. All but the most persistant lenders would eventually give up trying to
collect. Well fast forward a few decades and that same guy would be all like "debt
jubilee motherf***ers" until he p***ed off the wrong person.
About the only group I see benefiting is anyone that had cash in hand and happened
to need an organ transplant at the time, they would find a very ample spike in the
supply of transplant organs for a short while.
IdahoCopper wrote:Looking at the debtor side of the equation, the outcome is easily predictable. Since everyone would be debt free and have unencumbered ownership of their properties,
car, home, etc., a majority would immediately remortgage themselves and use the
cash to buy what they think they need and want.
Except a "debt jubilee" would destroy all trust and wipe out all financial institutions
which would destroy the functionality of electronic payment systems overnight.
There would be no "bank" afterwards and the few individuals with cash in hand
would probably not lend to anyone but the most trusted friend for the rest of
their lives. So anyone outside the "circle of trust" will have no access to credit,
and those inside it will have very limited access.
Without effective electronic payments any business of significant size (most
currently operating companies) won't be able to function so the vast majority
of the economy would grind to a halt.
Overall I think the wreckage would be worse than a hyperinflation.
Can't trust the currency, society can stumble through and find a new one.
Can't trust other people...that's a lot harder to recover from.