I agree with the general thesis, but want to challenge something from the article. It essentially said that until the past 2 weeks they never saw (over the last 15 years) the commercials be net long. Look at the bar chart they have included. The week of 9/5/17 (the first bar on the chart from a year ago) the commercials (maroon color) were net long, as evidenced by being above the zero line on the extreme left side of the chart. Am I missing something or is this in fact NOT the first time the commercials have been net long?
I'd like to also see the rest of the 15 years of data before reaching any real exciting conclusions. They talk about 15 years and show me charts only going back 1 year.
Also, Ted Butler (silver guru- who has been analyzing this info for many years now) has gotten really excited about silver a bunch of times. I appreciate his level of technical knowledge, but it hasn't made me any money.
To me, until I am proven wrong, I still see silver as something that can be in the doldrums for 10-20 years, punctuated by a 3-9 month period where it goes up, say, 300% to 1,000%. And the problem with that is that silver can quickly go up, say, 20-30% in just a few weeks. People get excited and buy aggressively because they think it is one of those 3-9 month gigantic moves. And it turns out to be a headfake. And then they become bitter and, in some cases, give up (or take to drinking again!)