Realcent.org

The U.S congress is planning to file Articles of Impeachment against President Obama after he rejected another bipartisan plan debt plan to prevent the U.S from a credit default.
Earlier today republicans warned President Obama that impeachment proceedings would be brought against him if he causes the nation to default on its debt.

Congressman Steve King, the Republic member of the House of Representative from Iowa, wrote on his twitter account Monday that President Barack Obama “would be impeached” if the nation falls into default.

Politico reported afterward on King’s threat and added that other members of congress were also ready to bring impeachment charges against Obama over the debt talks. Rep. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) warned earlier this month it would be “an impeachable offense” and Bruce Fein has already drafted articles of impeachment for House republicans to introduce.

NHsorter wrote:Obama won't be impeached. He has the worlds best impeachment insurance... Joe Biden.

Kurr wrote:You can not try a sitting president by law. They mustbe removed from office first. The impeachment is that vehicle to see if a president has indeed committed an offence worthy of removal.

Once removed, a criminal charge and trial can be effected. This is where I do not see the light here. What criminal charges could they bring for him vetoing an item, a function of the office, with the power to do so properly delegated to him.

scrapper2010 wrote:I don't follow how this could be done. Okay hypothetically then, house Republican's could draft up any debt limit plan they wished, however unreasonable and with absolutely zero concessions to the left, stand by it without compromising whatsoever, and if the prez doesn't bow to their demands in full then he could be impeached for not allowing the debt ceiling to be raised??? It seems to me, like it or not, voters have elected a majority of dems in the senate and a dem president. So isn't it the Repub's responsibilty to do the lion's share of compromising?

Sheikh_yer_Bu'Tay wrote:I cannot see them impeaching him over his veto power. How could they? and even if the House did impeach him, there is no way in Hell Harry Reid will let it go through the Senate. (Except as a sham trial crafted to embarrass the Republicans)

I have noticed there are a large amount of dumb-asses in the House on both sides of the isle. They can talk tuff about a lot of stuff that never happens.

If you would like to know how to impeach Obama, that process is working right now on some real crimes he has committed. A DC District Court judge has ordered a subpoena from the federal court for the state of HI to produce his real birth certificate, not the stupid fake birth certificate he posted a few months ago. HI is trying hard not to comply. They are even giving their state department of health director and everyone in the attny. generals office leave for two weeks so they don't have to answer the court ordered subpoena. Why the two week wait? Maybe someone needed time to manufacture more phony docs.

First, Social Security fraud. He proffers his SS# to be 042-68-4425. That is nearly impossible, for the prefix "042" is for a state Obama never was in at the time of his applying for a SS# at the age of 15 or 16. That is for the area around either CT, or NJ. I don't remember for sure. AND it was originally issued to someone else in the state. SSI Admin. states this number is not valid for any living person.

Second, Draft Registration fraud. Mr. Obama has used this invalid SSI# 042-68-4425 to register for the draft.

FOIA's are working their way through the courts. Time will tell if Emperor O gets impeached, or not.

My guess is he is such a Narcissist he will destroy the nation first before he allows himself to be thrown out of office. (Kinda like Hitler did). Maybe that is why he is resisting the budget process so hard. To destroy the dollar and our nation before the truth about him is finally outed.

Sheikh_yer_Bu'Tay wrote:I cannot see them impeaching him over his veto power. How could they? and even if the House did impeach him, there is no way in Hell Harry Reid will let it go through the Senate.

Mossy wrote:

Sheikh_yer_Bu'Tay wrote:I cannot see them impeaching him over his veto power. How could they? and even if the House did impeach him, there is no way in Hell Harry Reid will let it go through the Senate.

I think this is true. Congress has to pass something in order to force Obama to veto it, otherwise they are just acting like a bunch of cowards.

The rest? I just keeps piling up, doesn't it?

Mossy wrote:

Sheikh_yer_Bu'Tay wrote:I cannot see them impeaching him over his veto power. How could they? and even if the House did impeach him, there is no way in Hell Harry Reid will let it go through the Senate.

I think this is true. Congress has to pass something in order to force Obama to veto it, otherwise they are just acting like a bunch of cowards.

The rest? I just keeps piling up, doesn't it?

theo wrote:I doubt that Obama would veto anything that gets through the Senate. Such a bill would require at least a few democrat votes and, thus, be harder to cast as tea party extremism.

If a bill doesn't get through I think Obama will try to get around the debt ceiling as Bill Clinton is encouraging him to do. My fear is that he'll use Fed loans to spend money on what benefits him politically (union contracts, funding certain groups, bailing out California. . etc) and refuse funding in ways that make the House Republicans look bad, proclaiming, "I can't because of the debt ceiling." However, if he is not careful doing in that he could draw an impeachment.

Although, allowing the 8/2 or 8/10 deadline to pass without a deal might seem like good idea in some respects, it does seem to give a lot of discretionary spending authority to the executive branch supported by the Fed. Is that really what we want?

henrysmedford wrote: So the BBC in number three in the photo there is the word Impeachment