Lemon Thrower wrote:choosing one opportunity usually means you forego a different opportunity.
he suggests nickels are better than gold and silver. in most regards, that is not accurate. just look at the last 13 years for your proof.
scyther wrote:Kind of an interesting article, but he takes a long time to make some really obvious points. Face value is assured; metal value is a hedge against inflation. Gold doesn't have that dual protection. Got it.
You can still lose with nickels in real terms though, since it's not guaranteed that nickel and copper will go up along with general inflation, and they would have to stop making them in the present alloy, at the very least, for them to be worth anything over face. Probably we would have to wait for them to disappear from circulation, or rather get down to about 5-10%. that could happen very quickly with severe/hyperinflation, but barring that, it won't happen any time soon, considering how many copper pennies are still available 30 years later.
I think stacking some nickels is a good, basically risk-free idea if you're holding cash anyway, but if you want to profit from base metal coins, I think copper's the way to go.
The idea of windfall profits tax is sickening I highly doubt a new gold standard will happen, but, just... ugh.
Lol if it's true that Kyle Bass got all those nickels for face value without so much as a delivery charge, he has an awesome bank. He must have a lot of bank in that bank
scyther wrote:Lemon Thrower wrote:choosing one opportunity usually means you forego a different opportunity.
he suggests nickels are better than gold and silver. in most regards, that is not accurate. just look at the last 13 years for your proof.
That's not proof. The fact that gold and silver have already increased dramatically in price is not proof that they will keep going up more- it's reason to think they won't. When silver was $4 an ounce, a 1,000% increase in value was possible, and it happened, temporarily.. Can it go up in value 1,000% from its current price? I very highly doubt it.
When silver was $4 an ounce, could it have lost 80% of its value? No. Could it now? I think its unlikely, but its possible given where it is now and where it was 10 years ago.
The higher you buy, the less likely you are to profit.
angel2004 wrote:There are other good articles on nickels, one is on survivalblog and Lew Rockwell as well.
Klark Cent wrote:angel2004 wrote:There are other good articles on nickels, one is on survivalblog and Lew Rockwell as well.
this one?
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig10/rawles1.1.1.html
ZenOps wrote:The truest test of any physical item deemed as "money" is simply to see what ordinary people accept more of.
Go into the streets and offer to give away a silver eagle or four quarters, and you may find people preferring the cupronickel.
Older people may recognize and prefer the eagle, but the younger ones recognize nickel as being of worth.
ZenOps wrote:Nickel is also a currency. It circulates in the current timeframe by the majority as money. A cotton bill is also currency, but without intrinsic value.
Arguably, gold is not a currency to most Americans. In that respect, nickel and copper are higher value than gold.
ZenOps wrote:The truest test of any physical item deemed as "money" is simply to see what ordinary people accept more of.
Go into the streets and offer to give away a silver eagle or four quarters, and you may find people preferring the cupronickel.
Older people may recognize and prefer the eagle, but the younger ones recognize nickel as being of worth.
Return to Nickel Bullion & CuNi Bullion Coins
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests