OneBiteAtATime wrote:QUICK, EVERYONE! Sell your Franklin Mint Crap to Ray before he changes his mind!!!!
Lemon Thrower wrote:the problem i have with FM is that as a buyer you can never got on the same page as the seller. they always think their stuff is worth 200% of melt, lol.
pennypicker wrote:I've always liked silver products made by both The Franklin Mint & The Washington Mint. However years from now in a SHTF scenerio when the average Joe will be using silver for barter the average person will not recogize and will not have any clue as to whether these pretty & unusual silver items are in fact real--even if they are stamped.
Counterfeiting will be rampant by then and even ASE's will cause people to question their authenticity. This is why in such trying times, should they ever occur, I will feel most comfortable bartering with average circulated Franklin halves & Mercury dimes. Of course these will be counterfeited as well to a degree but I strongly feel that the "average joe" will feel more confident accepting these two forms of silver (they must be average circulated) than any other form of silver available.
And if you really want to get picky on what will fall in the category of "the most trusted" forms of authentic silver then I vote for the '61, '62, & '63 proof sets. You can pick (less than desireable looking sets) today for roughly 35% over spot and a counterfeiter would really have to be desperate to invest the extra time & money to reproduce all five coins with a proof appearance as well as reproduce that intricate pattern in the government cello packaging. So when silver is $100 or $200 an ounce and above and counterfeiting is rampant I will be quite confident in accepting in barter a '61, '62 or '63 proof set from anyone that I didn't know.
SilverDragon72 wrote:pennypicker wrote:I've always liked silver products made by both The Franklin Mint & The Washington Mint. However years from now in a SHTF scenerio when the average Joe will be using silver for barter the average person will not recogize and will not have any clue as to whether these pretty & unusual silver items are in fact real--even if they are stamped.
Counterfeiting will be rampant by then and even ASE's will cause people to question their authenticity. This is why in such trying times, should they ever occur, I will feel most comfortable bartering with average circulated Franklin halves & Mercury dimes. Of course these will be counterfeited as well to a degree but I strongly feel that the "average joe" will feel more confident accepting these two forms of silver (they must be average circulated) than any other form of silver available.
And if you really want to get picky on what will fall in the category of "the most trusted" forms of authentic silver then I vote for the '61, '62, & '63 proof sets. You can pick (less than desireable looking sets) today for roughly 35% over spot and a counterfeiter would really have to be desperate to invest the extra time & money to reproduce all five coins with a proof appearance as well as reproduce that intricate pattern in the government cello packaging. So when silver is $100 or $200 an ounce and above and counterfeiting is rampant I will be quite confident in accepting in barter a '61, '62 or '63 proof set from anyone that I didn't know.
Do the counterfeited coins make a distinct silver sound when dropped or ping tested?
I have no experience with any fakes yet, and hope to keep it that way. I like to think I'm doing my DD.
How sophisticated are the fakes these days? I know that most of them are trying to replicate key date
and other Numi coins...for now. Obviously that trend will change in the future as silver becomes more
expensive and rare.
BamaJoe wrote:One of my favorites was the bank collection. It was 50 ignots and each one featured a main bank from each of the 50 states.
Return to Silver Bullion, Gold, & other Bullion Metals
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests