Z00 wrote:A question has been nagging me regarding some of the pricing done on the BIN threads on this forum.
"JUNK" silver is supposed to be coins that are of such a poor quality that they have no numismatic value.
Junk is a misnomer if you are using it strictly in this sense. If that were the case, you could only refer to slicks as junk silver, whereas ALL 90% silver coins are widely referred to as junk silver. Not sure how the name got started, but we're stuck with it. All older coins, regardless of weight, are numies to
someone, everyone starts with an album that they fill with "junk" and then, budget affording, upgrade from there. Most rolls of Walkers or Mercs sold by long-standing members have had the culls (bad thins) weeded out. Bullion wise? You're slightly better off buying a roll of rosies at avg wt 123.6 grams (.715) than an avg wt roll of mercs (121.8), but the difference you spend... or "overspend" depending upon your point of view, is worth it to some who view these earlier denominations as unsurpassed in design beauty, compared to newer drab types. One final point... when the day arrives that counterfeits inundate the markets, it might prove more likely that the Chinese would focus on full wt modern coins rather than going to all the effort to reproduce worn versions of older types (although that remains to be seen
)