Junk silver or not.
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 5:21 pm
A question has been nagging me regarding some of the pricing done on the BIN threads on this forum.
"JUNK" silver is supposed to be coins that are of such a poor quality that they have no numismatic value. Yet mercury dimes are fairly consistently priced higher than roosies. They are more worn, so the silver content is on average less. If they have no collectible value, what justifies their being priced with a higher premium? At that point, with an average lower silver melt value, shouldn't they be priced lower?
"JUNK" silver is supposed to be coins that are of such a poor quality that they have no numismatic value. Yet mercury dimes are fairly consistently priced higher than roosies. They are more worn, so the silver content is on average less. If they have no collectible value, what justifies their being priced with a higher premium? At that point, with an average lower silver melt value, shouldn't they be priced lower?