Page 1 of 1

Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 8:08 am
by 68Camaro
Just thought I'd jump ahead of the line to be the first to post this subject.

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 8:13 am
by SoFa
Is that a prediction or a price target?

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 8:17 am
by 68Camaro
dyodd...

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 8:17 am
by Double3
No way.

I don't see it going much below $350.

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 8:28 am
by scyther
Double3 wrote:No way.

I don't see it going much below $350.

I think it was a joke. That said, it could go below $100 in 2013 dollars in the future due to asteroid mining, filtering gold out of ocean water, etc.

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 8:28 am
by Copper Catcher
:D :D :D :D

If Gold falls below $100 on or before 12-31-13; I'll send you a 1oz American Silver Eagle!

At that point they will be worthless anyway.... :shifty:

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 8:30 am
by scyther
Copper Catcher wrote::D :D :D :D

If Gold falls below $100 on or before 12-31-13; I'll send you a 1oz American Silver Eagle!

At that point they will be worthless anyway.... :shifty:

I'll send him an ounce of gold if that happens.

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 8:56 am
by ZenOps
Could happen. The 1923 German 500 mark coin is smaller than the 3 mark coin of 1922.

Noone said that in a deflation that you couldn't simply revalue the dollars instead of revaluing all the commodities. I don't think its something that should be done short of during wartime (and I mean real war, not the small conflicts, and whining young generation demonstrations that are going on right now)

And they would probably confiscate all deposits over $100,000 and all paper metal assets first.

But... Could happen.

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 9:24 am
by blackrabbit
Hey that Eagle will still be worth one dollar!

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 9:24 am
by 68Camaro
ZenOps wrote:Could happen. The 1923 German 500 mark coin is smaller than the 3 mark coin of 1922.

Noone said that in a deflation that you couldn't simply revalue the dollars instead of revaluing all the commodities. I don't think its something that should be done short of during wartime (and I mean real war, not the small conflicts, and whining young generation demonstrations that are going on right now)

And they would probably confiscate all deposits over $100,000 and all paper metal assets first.

But... Could happen.



Correct, maybe I should start the "gold below $10" thread as well...

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 9:25 am
by slickeast
Rich, did you eat Taco Bell before you went to bed? I think something is causing you to have bizarre dreams.

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 9:31 am
by 68Camaro
slickeast wrote:Rich, did you eat Taco Bell before you went to bed? I think something is causing you to have bizarre dreams.


Guess I'm just grumpy from the third straight day of pouring rain with no end in sight. ;)

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 12:01 pm
by johnbrickner
scyther wrote: . . . That said, it could go below $100 in 2013 dollars in the future due to asteroid mining, filtering gold out of ocean water, etc.


:lol: Now, that's a good joke!

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 12:27 pm
by Double3
scyther wrote:
Double3 wrote:No way.

I don't see it going much below $350.

I think it was a joke. That said, it could go below $100 in 2013 dollars in the future due to asteroid mining, filtering gold out of ocean water, etc.

No kidding?

I was playing along.......

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 1:26 pm
by CardsNCoins
Is there a chance you could be 100% wrong?

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 1:38 pm
by 68Camaro
CardsNCoins wrote:Is there a chance you could be 100% wrong?


Indeed, there is that chance. Price is king, and the future is unknowable.

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 2:03 pm
by inflationhawk
Genius!!! You are a true pro. I worship your price targeting skills.

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 3:06 pm
by 68Camaro
inflationhawk wrote:Genius!!! You are a true pro. I worship your price targeting skills.


Thank you! I was hoping for that - it makes the rain not matter so much...

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 3:19 pm
by inflationhawk
Can you predict the weather too?

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 4:33 pm
by 68Camaro
inflationhawk wrote:Can you predict the weather too?


Yep, it's going to be wet tomorrow... (and dark tonight...)

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 5:27 pm
by inflationhawk
Brilliant!

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 8:10 pm
by Copper Catcher
Do you have a subscription service and a newsletter? :) Financial Porn News?

Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 8:26 pm
by neilgin1
68Camaro wrote:
CardsNCoins wrote:Is there a chance you could be 100% wrong?


Indeed, there is that chance. Price is king, and the future is unknowable.


it's much more sinister than all that:

Coordinated Harassment and Neutralization of “Social Undesirables”

I write to inform you of some very terrifying phenomena affecting thousands of individuals across America: the crimes of organized stalking (“bullying on steroids”) and remote, electronic harassment.

By Edmund Igberaese
Intellihub.com
June 6, 2013

In 2008, F.B.I. whistleblower Ted Gunderson warned of a “tax-payer funded, genocidal purge” conducted by an “illegal, government-criminal enterprise” funded by “black budget” programs and powerful individuals. These individuals, as now targeted mainstream journalist Vic Livingston reported, retained the ability to “red-line” innocent individuals by community-policing units designed to vilify and harass “terrorists” in a post-9-11 world
However, as now blacklisted scientist Robin Webster reveals, many of these individuals are innocent and have been arbitrarily classified as “social undesirables” by vengeful or otherwise criminal yet influential entities…In addition, Webster, Livingston, Gunderson, and a host of others suggest the ongoing use of America’s Radio-Frequency Directed Energy (R.F.D.E.) system to further isolate and “break the will” of often once successful individuals.

The R.F.D.E. System, a component of euphemistically termed “non-lethal weaponry,” can produce varied biological effects, including remotely delivered “shocks” (via maser-guided plasma from microwave plasma generators, one of the earlier ones being developed by Russel Targ of the Stanford Research Institute in the 1970s), the microwave auditory effect (this sensation of “hearing voices” was first induced by Allen Frey in the 1960s via radio wave stimulation of nervous systems), Radio Hypnotic Intracerebral Control (R.H.I.C.: a capability for precision-control of a human being first developed by the Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) in the mid-20th century and analogized by C.I.A.-employed Dr. Jose Delgado’s infamous stopping of a raging, implanted bull via the push of a button), and various forms of E.E.G. Heterodyning or mixing (“mind-melding”) of human brain waves (this capability, exposed by U.S. Department of Defense Whistle-blower Robert Duncan and others, can induce powerful, strange emotional experiences and is attested to by Duke University’s recent [in February 2013] “mind-melding” of rats from different countries over the internet via implanted electrodes that resulted in the rats initiating similar behaviors. Many, including Duncan and Gunderson, have claimed, as well, that these technological advances are being randomly tested on innocent, unwitting, and non-political American citizens (see attorney/activist Cheryl Walsh’s June 2012 article in the Essex Review attached to this document).

Here, you may consider that our laws are simply too “conservative” to keep up with these covert scientific advances in psycho-tronics and terrifying scales of human depravity; yet, I urge you to consider U.N. and European resolutions calling for a ban on these “potential weapons of mass destruction,” U.S. Congressman Dennis Kucinich’s unsuccessful 2001 Space Preservation Act that called for a similar ban on “electromagnetic radiation” (EMR) weaponry, Michigan’s anti-EMR law against electronic harassment (distinctive of cyber-harassment and concerning the aforementioned biological effects) established in 2004, similar laws in Maine & Massachussetts, and Missouri State Representative Jim Guest’s letter (attached to this letter) to Congress demanding an investigation of these horrific crimes for which Nazi scientists and soldiers were hung at Nuremberg trials shortly after World War II.

Let’s not forget, of course, laws against nonconsensual implantation in the states of Nevada, Wisconsin, and California prompted in part by the success of James Walbert’s 2008 lawsuit against his business partner for nonconsensual implantation.

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED....FLEE NOW....BEFORE "THEY" GET YOU TOO!!!!!!!!!!!!


Re: Gold below $100

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 11:34 pm
by scyther
neilgin1 wrote:
68Camaro wrote:
CardsNCoins wrote:Is there a chance you could be 100% wrong?


Indeed, there is that chance. Price is king, and the future is unknowable.


it's much more sinister than all that:

Coordinated Harassment and Neutralization of “Social Undesirables”

I write to inform you of some very terrifying phenomena affecting thousands of individuals across America: the crimes of organized stalking (“bullying on steroids”) and remote, electronic harassment.

By Edmund Igberaese
Intellihub.com
June 6, 2013

In 2008, F.B.I. whistleblower Ted Gunderson warned of a “tax-payer funded, genocidal purge” conducted by an “illegal, government-criminal enterprise” funded by “black budget” programs and powerful individuals. These individuals, as now targeted mainstream journalist Vic Livingston reported, retained the ability to “red-line” innocent individuals by community-policing units designed to vilify and harass “terrorists” in a post-9-11 world
However, as now blacklisted scientist Robin Webster reveals, many of these individuals are innocent and have been arbitrarily classified as “social undesirables” by vengeful or otherwise criminal yet influential entities…In addition, Webster, Livingston, Gunderson, and a host of others suggest the ongoing use of America’s Radio-Frequency Directed Energy (R.F.D.E.) system to further isolate and “break the will” of often once successful individuals.

The R.F.D.E. System, a component of euphemistically termed “non-lethal weaponry,” can produce varied biological effects, including remotely delivered “shocks” (via maser-guided plasma from microwave plasma generators, one of the earlier ones being developed by Russel Targ of the Stanford Research Institute in the 1970s), the microwave auditory effect (this sensation of “hearing voices” was first induced by Allen Frey in the 1960s via radio wave stimulation of nervous systems), Radio Hypnotic Intracerebral Control (R.H.I.C.: a capability for precision-control of a human being first developed by the Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) in the mid-20th century and analogized by C.I.A.-employed Dr. Jose Delgado’s infamous stopping of a raging, implanted bull via the push of a button), and various forms of E.E.G. Heterodyning or mixing (“mind-melding”) of human brain waves (this capability, exposed by U.S. Department of Defense Whistle-blower Robert Duncan and others, can induce powerful, strange emotional experiences and is attested to by Duke University’s recent [in February 2013] “mind-melding” of rats from different countries over the internet via implanted electrodes that resulted in the rats initiating similar behaviors. Many, including Duncan and Gunderson, have claimed, as well, that these technological advances are being randomly tested on innocent, unwitting, and non-political American citizens (see attorney/activist Cheryl Walsh’s June 2012 article in the Essex Review attached to this document).

Here, you may consider that our laws are simply too “conservative” to keep up with these covert scientific advances in psycho-tronics and terrifying scales of human depravity; yet, I urge you to consider U.N. and European resolutions calling for a ban on these “potential weapons of mass destruction,” U.S. Congressman Dennis Kucinich’s unsuccessful 2001 Space Preservation Act that called for a similar ban on “electromagnetic radiation” (EMR) weaponry, Michigan’s anti-EMR law against electronic harassment (distinctive of cyber-harassment and concerning the aforementioned biological effects) established in 2004, similar laws in Maine & Massachussetts, and Missouri State Representative Jim Guest’s letter (attached to this letter) to Congress demanding an investigation of these horrific crimes for which Nazi scientists and soldiers were hung at Nuremberg trials shortly after World War II.

Let’s not forget, of course, laws against nonconsensual implantation in the states of Nevada, Wisconsin, and California prompted in part by the success of James Walbert’s 2008 lawsuit against his business partner for nonconsensual implantation.

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED....FLEE NOW....BEFORE "THEY" GET YOU TOO!!!!!!!!!!!!


What does this have to do with what you quoted?