Q. David Bowers on Silver
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2011 4:20 pm
There are many sharp minds here so I wanted to share this.
I was skimming a recent issue of coin world. Reading Q. David Bowers The Joys of Collecting piece as it was titled "Popular delusions. Observe lessons of history".
In his article he pointed out that 1950-D Jefferson 5 cent rolls were trading for $1,200 in 1964. Now they’re going for about third of that. Mentioned a book Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds by Charles Mackey in 1841. Brought up the Dutch tulip bulb bubble. Cited a study that the price of silver being over $25 per ounce had no basis in reality. That use for silver was film industry and mints. The only reason for the rise in price of silver was investors demand. Said silver was not gold and therefore held not world monetary value as a hedge against devaluation of the dollar.
All in all it was pretty much a back handed slap to silver. Ok, I understand the following the masses is not always wise part. 50-D nickels and the classic tulip bulb case is quite a stretch. Silver is a community after all, not a collectable baseball card. However, he does make a point that the run up in silver is investor driven. However, I think he may be a little off downplaying the industrial use of silver.
Personally, I think Bower’s may be a walking tome of numismatic knowledge. But is he stepping out of his realm talking about bullion? Is Silver a hedge against a falling dollar or is gold and other (i.e. oil) commodities the only ticket?
Thoughts? Comments? Ideas?
I was skimming a recent issue of coin world. Reading Q. David Bowers The Joys of Collecting piece as it was titled "Popular delusions. Observe lessons of history".
In his article he pointed out that 1950-D Jefferson 5 cent rolls were trading for $1,200 in 1964. Now they’re going for about third of that. Mentioned a book Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds by Charles Mackey in 1841. Brought up the Dutch tulip bulb bubble. Cited a study that the price of silver being over $25 per ounce had no basis in reality. That use for silver was film industry and mints. The only reason for the rise in price of silver was investors demand. Said silver was not gold and therefore held not world monetary value as a hedge against devaluation of the dollar.
All in all it was pretty much a back handed slap to silver. Ok, I understand the following the masses is not always wise part. 50-D nickels and the classic tulip bulb case is quite a stretch. Silver is a community after all, not a collectable baseball card. However, he does make a point that the run up in silver is investor driven. However, I think he may be a little off downplaying the industrial use of silver.
Personally, I think Bower’s may be a walking tome of numismatic knowledge. But is he stepping out of his realm talking about bullion? Is Silver a hedge against a falling dollar or is gold and other (i.e. oil) commodities the only ticket?
Thoughts? Comments? Ideas?