Treetop wrote: financially speaking this was a very unwise move, even though the spot is top notch. We can afford it of course or we wouldnt have done it, but we lost all the capitol invested in the cheap place in town. We didnt save up a nice stash to get this place, in fact we sold some of our savings for the down payment. .
barrytrot wrote:I'll stay in the city, thanks
NHsorter wrote:Treetop wrote: financially speaking this was a very unwise move, even though the spot is top notch. We can afford it of course or we wouldnt have done it, but we lost all the capitol invested in the cheap place in town. We didnt save up a nice stash to get this place, in fact we sold some of our savings for the down payment. .
Don't sell yourself short. Upgrading when the market is down is not a bad move. So the first place was not a gain. No big deal. You got in a better place when the market was low so your net gain down the road should be good. Think of it as selling a bunch of 90% right now that you bought at $40 and using the proceeds as a down payment on a monster box. Sure, you took a loss on the 90%, but who cares. When silver gets back up over $40 you will be glad that you made the move.
barrytrot wrote:I'll stay in the city, thanks
beauanderos wrote:barrytrot wrote:I'll stay in the city, thanks
No... the roving hordes thank you, Barry. But hey, I'm in the same boat
beauanderos wrote:barrytrot wrote:I'll stay in the city, thanks
No... the roving hordes thank you, Barry. But hey, I'm in the same boat, so who am I to talk? "C'mon over, all you starving freeloaders who didn't plan ahead... let me season those groceries you're attempting to steal out of my garage with some rock salt served at 200mph."
shinnosuke wrote:BOTTOM!! As in: We are searching for a new bottom.
Oakair wrote:shinnosuke wrote:BOTTOM!! As in: We are searching for a new bottom.
Or as in: triple BOTTOM breakdown
slara512 wrote:@beauanderos : Thats correct. The leverage of currency and the banking system makes it so that a small change in the Dollar causes or is associated with larger changes in other asset prices. US dollar was almost twice as high in 2000 when gold, silver, oil, etc were many more multiples lower than recent highs.
maybe I should have said SLV/(USD*FED leverage)
68Camaro wrote:If that really made sense, if there was cause and effect, then there should be a correlation, even if by a factor. There isn't one. It's true that changes in the USD index and changes in PM prices can be observed to occur at the same times, somewhat frequently, but too often there is zero or even negative correlation, and even when they head in a consistent direction the proportionality factors change constantly. I've been watching this for two years now and have yet to match the pattern. There is FAR more going on than just pricing.
68Camaro wrote:If that really made sense, if there was cause and effect, then there should be a correlation, even if by a factor. There isn't one. It's true that changes in the USD index and changes in PM prices can be observed to occur at the same times, somewhat frequently, but too often there is zero or even negative correlation, and even when they head in a consistent direction the proportionality factors change constantly. I've been watching this for two years now and have yet to match the pattern. There is FAR more going on than just pricing.
68Camaro wrote:I don't get at all excited about the 1980 number - that's an event driven peak. If we see that it'll be for other reasons, different sets of events.
Return to Silver Bullion, Gold, & other Bullion Metals
Users browsing this forum: Treetop and 19 guests