creshka46 wrote: And when I asked him what he thought of all the email and Clinton Foundation stuff, he said it's all just speculation. I said we'll have to agree to disagree.
I encounter many who think this. It blows my mind. It was 100% verified she had classified materials on her server, which is totally illegal. From wikileaks we found "friends of WJC" which refers to people who donated or paid for speeches did indeed get a meeting with the state dept. Which by itself is pay for play. It is worth noting in this case and all the materials before this, nothing wikileaks has thus far posted has proven to be fake later. Might happen in the future but it hasnt yet. They have a better track record then any media source I know of by far in this regard. On top of this she destroyed subpoenaed materials, people just do not usually get away with any of this.
As for Trumps court case with the 13 year old girl. It is looking more and more like a potential scam. A guy related to this case was also involved in a bunch of other tabloid news stories. Which doesnt prove it false by itself but it is a major red flag to be sure. It is also worth noting that NYT investigated Trumps treatment of women for months, interviewed dozens of women and the worst the came up with was Trump while single publicly telling a women she looked great in a bikini then they dated for a bit. Somehow they didnt find any of these other women who claim he did things, and they just happened to be dropped into the national debate at key times and as wikileaks which the clintons knew was coming started showing us just how corrupt they were.