theo wrote:When times get tough, I prefer the home field advantage.
johnbrickner wrote:On a side note, did you know (along with other details) living in Canada for 3 years and denouncing your u.s. citizenship will get you Canadian Citizenship...
Morsecode wrote:I guess you could always marry a Canadian
theo wrote:If you are leaving the U.S. to avoid the worst consequences of an American (and then global) economic collapse, you need to consider how such an event would effect the conditions in your prospective new home. For example if you want to escape North to Canada you should remember how mutually dependent these two economies are. The Bahamas make even less sense in a collapse scenario. Many of these islands have much larger populations than could be supported by indigenous resources. Do you really want to be there when the re-supply boats from the mainland stop coming?
I think that the ideal destination would be resource rich, sparely populated and decidedly low-tech. Panama and Costa Rica seem fit this bill, but their political stability (post-collapse) and cultural/language challenges concern me. I know that with a full scale collapse things in the U.S. would be very bad, however some areas might fare pretty well. Moving abroad might make sense for those who have means along with the correct knowledge and skill set, but for most us, it might make more sense to seek out the more resilient communities in our own country.
IdahoCopper wrote:New Zealand pretty much tops the list. If you have assets you can "buy" a resident permit. Australia is a close second or third. Iceland fits in there somewhere too.
IdahoCopper wrote:Do a google for "emmigrate to". And see the suggested complete. Iceland, New Zealand, Australia, Sweden.
Return to Economic & Business News, Reports, and Predictions
Users browsing this forum: shinnosuke and 24 guests