blackrabbit wrote:I thought this thread was called "Being cool about this" ?
neilgin1 wrote:well, i guess you're smarter than me then.....but not as smart as to engage in patronizing rhetoric shot my way...we'll let it trade. seems to me, a while back, right before we zipped to 49, werent you making a case for it going lower? correct me if i'm wrong, or "too obvious".
slickeast wrote:blackrabbit wrote:I thought this thread was called "Being cool about this" ?
I think they are in love with each other.
slickeast wrote:blackrabbit wrote:I thought this thread was called "Being cool about this" ?
I think they are in love with each other.
Jonflyfish wrote:Perhaps folks are reading too deep into this.
When someone chooses to lash out with an ill minded attempt to attack the character of others with loose falsehoods, incorrect assumptions full of empty rhetoric with a conscious effort to defame the character of others, they should be held accountable for such. Blatant lies are intolerable. The origin of this is clearly documented in the archives. I was compelled to set the record straight. No hatred or otherwise from me. That is not my character or style.
Either way its all just mind over matter. I no longer mind because this no longer matters.
I'm "being cool about this"
Cheers,
Jon
Jonflyfish wrote:Neil, you either suffer from dementia or are delusional. Not only was I lucky enough to locate the break near $17 (as posted on the old site) as a major rally point for a strong breakout, but was fortunate enough to be core short silver from the highs, reloading for a bounce then reversing on the lower high in keeping with the well documented Realcent Black Swan.
SteelCityCopper wrote:Jonflyfish wrote:Neil, you either suffer from dementia or are delusional. Not only was I lucky enough to locate the break near $17 (as posted on the old site) as a major rally point for a strong breakout, but was fortunate enough to be core short silver from the highs, reloading for a bounce then reversing on the lower high in keeping with the well documented Realcent Black Swan.
Ignoring all the personal back patting going on here and cutting to the chase, the "Realcent Black Swan" mentioned is mislabeling at its best. This is just a broad brushstroke of categorization here, but Realcenters will more than likely fall into one of these categories:
1) Hoarder/Stacker
2) Flipper/Trader (physical or paper)
3) Collector
Now let's assess... a Black Swan is an event that is surprising with major impact and normally associated with a bad or negative outcome to the majority of a group (perhaps not always, but usually). If I was a betting man, I'd say the majority of folks here would fall into the hoarder/stacker or collector groups. Don't get me wrong, we do have plenty of traders here, but we're talking about majorities - side note: this would actually be a cool survey.
Now here's the fun part... last time I checked lower prices were a GOOD thing for hoarders/stackers and collectors which may make up the majority here correct? Even if folks in these categories are holding $40toz silver... it doesn't matter to them because it’s a totally different mindset and goal than a trader/flipper. You don't lose money until you sell at a lower price which traders may have to do at times but is irrelevant to the hoarder or collector.
The moral of the story is don’t let traders get to you with jargon like this if you’re true intentions and goals for PMs are beyond just flipping and making a quick buck. Don’t feel like you’ve “done something wrong” just because you bought at a higher price. The time will come when anyone with physical will pat themselves on the back and can post on this forum with their fingers pointed.
Jonflyfish wrote:SteelCityCopper wrote:Jonflyfish wrote:Neil, you either suffer from dementia or are delusional. Not only was I lucky enough to locate the break near $17 (as posted on the old site) as a major rally point for a strong breakout, but was fortunate enough to be core short silver from the highs, reloading for a bounce then reversing on the lower high in keeping with the well documented Realcent Black Swan.
Ignoring all the personal back patting going on here and cutting to the chase, the "Realcent Black Swan" mentioned is mislabeling at its best. This is just a broad brushstroke of categorization here, but Realcenters will more than likely fall into one of these categories:
1) Hoarder/Stacker
2) Flipper/Trader (physical or paper)
3) Collector
Now let's assess... a Black Swan is an event that is surprising with major impact and normally associated with a bad or negative outcome to the majority of a group (perhaps not always, but usually). If I was a betting man, I'd say the majority of folks here would fall into the hoarder/stacker or collector groups. Don't get me wrong, we do have plenty of traders here, but we're talking about majorities - side note: this would actually be a cool survey.
Now here's the fun part... last time I checked lower prices were a GOOD thing for hoarders/stackers and collectors which may make up the majority here correct? Even if folks in these categories are holding $40toz silver... it doesn't matter to them because it’s a totally different mindset and goal than a trader/flipper. You don't lose money until you sell at a lower price which traders may have to do at times but is irrelevant to the hoarder or collector.
The moral of the story is don’t let traders get to you with jargon like this if you’re true intentions and goals for PMs are beyond just flipping and making a quick buck. Don’t feel like you’ve “done something wrong” just because you bought at a higher price. The time will come when anyone with physical will pat themselves on the back and can post on this forum with their fingers pointed.
I don't know what the moral of your story means. It seems like you are classifying certain folks as good and bad. Are you saying that being a "trader/flipper" is bad? Is that the same as saying that all coin dealers are good and serve as well intended charities who offer cheap coins and would never hustle a less informed buyer into buying some over priced "rare" coins as way to preserve their wealth? I'm not trying to stir the pot, Just trying to understand the "moral" as its defined.
The black swan event was not intended to be a bias towards feeling good or bad.
68Camaro wrote: But don't complain as though the jargon is some special secret stuff or a deliberate attempt to puff oneself up. I know better than that of the writer.
68Camaro wrote:As I was submitting this Neil replied, but I'll submit this anyway. Staying out of the bulk of the later fray, I'll just comment that I have no idea what the issue was with the trader jargon. It's common stuff, if you read anything on the subject. The metaphors are almost self-explanatory. Bulls and Bears. Falling Knives. Listen to any trading show, CNBC (no matter what you think of them) etc, or read any trading column, and you'll get more than an earful of it. But if you don't get something, either search for it on the web, as I've done in the past, or ask. Or ignore it and move along. But don't complain as though the jargon is some special secret stuff or a deliberate attempt to
puff oneself up. I know better than that of the writer.
Return to Silver Bullion, Gold, & other Bullion Metals
Users browsing this forum: MaxGravy and 105 guests