neilgin1 wrote:
well, i'll call your BS, and raise it, all in bud, you aint dealing with some hump, pal, that aint been there and done that for many a year, i'm not wasting time going around with you on this, but what is it, about segregated funds you dont understand? open interest and volumne has been down, in every single physical future's market, since MF's implosion and the CME, the CFTC and NFA screwed the pooch on this one. i'm seeing PHYSICAL trading going on at +$5-10 over the 'board' basis March with its 'robust' OI of 55,000 cars, so please dont insult my intelligence. i truly only wish you good fortune in your futures trade, but dont think me your cyber bitch, i been around the game a while now, and the board is turning into a bs pricing mechanism, and if YOU think thats BS, stand for delivery then, watch what happens.
furthermore, its been my experience, as well as the many guys i know, trading the week between Christmas and New Years is for bush leaguer's, so put the "cheer(s)" into this week, instead of the end of your post. Happy New Year.
My point is directly about your claim. You can can say what you want about criminal dealings with brokers, RC members, both financial and physical positions i.e. MF Global, RC members walking from deals when prices fall, tungsten gold or lead silver etc etc. Your claim was about "the board" (Chicago), which actually, we are talking about "the floor" in NY. Stand for delivery, don't stand for delivery, JPM getting their position squeezed to the moon etc etc....ad nauseam rubbish! Truth is in price. By the way, How do physical dealers quote their inventory? Could it be COMEX + a differential. Could large deals be from the London noon fix? Why use such "irrelevant" prices?
There is no insult intended to your pride ego or intelligence. I hope that you may have all that you desire.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6955b/6955b8572bb383c4d9b3f89cf4dd913b086e7905" alt="Smile :)"
Your claim was that the exchange somehow has less "relevance". It is stricly your opinion. There is no evidence otherwise, none. Open interest is a poor argument. When commodity prices go down, spec OI usually does as well, MFG or not. Spec books generally increase positions on bullish runs, where OI tends to increase. Commercial and hedging are different but that does not prove anything about your claim of relevance.
My trades on the CME Group's NYMEX COMEX silver 5k oz contracts will have full relevance and settle mark to market at settlement today- 100% in full. Full confidence and full credit to my avccount period. There is no "less than" about it. I can fantisize about SHTF and how irrelevant my USD balance is but those funds are 100% accepted with all physical sources I deal with as well.
I know of your many claims about all of your experience and how silver was about to rally like wildfire just before it fell off a cliff etc etc but none of that has anything to do with the settlement today and if it will be relevant. The exchange is fully relevant becasue I will get full credit for my trades there. Please provide evidence that my bids and offers that were executed will not prove to be relevant.
55k cars? Are we now talking about ethanol and "THE (Chigaco) BOARD" (of trade) ?...
Cheers!