68Camaro wrote:If we forget supply and demand then I'm not sure we're talking about a real price of a real commodity. If we're not talking about something that is real, then why is $18 the base? Why not $9? Or any other number. At some point I stop caring because paper and physical will have disconnected.
This is where I am at too. I do believe that paper is eventually going to zero, and we have seen in times like these and in 2008 that the paper price doesn't matter so much to the physical market at least until somebody is willing to supply it at the new price and let it trickle down.
I also am on board with Rodebaugh's analysis that $18 seems like a plausible bottom point as there is more support there on the graph than my trend target of $21, but as we know the paper price can do anything. If we do see $18 I doubt the physical metal will get a whole lot cheaper than it is now. I have been a buyer at almost every price point over the last 5 years because I believe regardless of how low we go this round that the next round will be new highs, and even if that's not the case I'd rather secure my position in the present than put it out into the future with unknown circumstances, because my primary goal isn't profit as much as the protection that tangible assets provide.
Silver: the Rodney Dangerfield of precious metals.
If it's printed on a piece of paper it's worth the paper it's printed on.
If it's a digital asset it's worth the electrons in cyberspace.