NHsorter wrote:I hear ya Doc, but I'm actually trying to get this little shack paid off. If it makes sense or not I just don't want to have a house payment any longer. Call it freedom. Call it DEflation insurance. Whatever. I'm just not ready to "Bet the house" on inflation.
Hummm.... I wonder how low of an interest rate I could get on a loan for a large chunk of land somewhere?
Rodebaugh wrote:Truth be told......House debt is excellent debt. Tax favorable and a source for equity. I am ready for the tar and feathers.
NHsorter wrote:I hear ya Doc, but I'm actually trying to get this little shack paid off. If it makes sense or not I just don't want to have a house payment any longer. Call it freedom. Call it DEflation insurance. Whatever. I'm just not ready to "Bet the house" on inflation.
Hummm.... I wonder how low of an interest rate I could get on a loan for a large chunk of land somewhere?
Rodebaugh wrote:Truth be told......House debt is excellent debt. Tax favorable and a source for equity. I am ready for the tar and feathers.
NHsorter wrote:I know house debt is good and I inderstand the logic. But it's my dwelling and I want to own it. Then it is settled no matter of inflation, deflation, stagflation, or otherwise.
I could rather easily turn my equity into cheap cheap debt, but then what do I do with the equity? Any investment with a worthwhile return has the possibility of suddenly evaporating or at least being greatly diminished. If I lose a ton of stock, that sucks. If metals prices fall off a cliff, that sucks. I could hold cash but that could be devalued. I could start a business but that could go south for various reasons.
I'm not saying stocks, metals, and businesses are BAD to be invested in. But they are each their own gamble and the one thing I don't want to gamble with is my home.
Engineer wrote:Rodebaugh wrote:Truth be told......House debt is excellent debt. Tax favorable and a source for equity. I am ready for the tar and feathers.
House debt may be an excellent form of debt, but its still debt.
I'm not opposed to using leverage as a necessary tool. It should be done, however, with the understanding that risks compound as well as gains.
TXBullion wrote:Engineer wrote:Rodebaugh wrote:Truth be told......House debt is excellent debt. Tax favorable and a source for equity. I am ready for the tar and feathers.
House debt may be an excellent form of debt, but its still debt.
I'm not opposed to using leverage as a necessary tool. It should be done, however, with the understanding that risks compound as well as gains.
Not necessarily , structured properly , your risk can remain a fixed position while your gain has an unlimited position.
Ex. You buy property A for 100k. You pay 20 k down, obtain non recourse debt for 80k. You default, stop paying, etc you lose the property. Your risk is always fixed at 20k (assuming you did not invest more into improvements etc). Your gains, you keep 100% of them. Goes up 50k in value, all yours, goes up 100k all yours.
You have essentially created a position where you have fixed risk ( you know your max downside ) and your gains are limitless ( so to speak)
This excludes the hypothetical event of a lawsuit but that is a product of other factors not leverage
TXBullion wrote:I was specifically referring to a specific type of investment scenario. It would most likely not be a house but something with non recourse debt OR non recourse refis as that would be more typical on commercial ( maybe not even real in residential)
I see what you are saying. I just meant you always have a fixed downside ( in theory) . Its not like when you get the leverage, you will lose more than your equity position should you walk away. You have variants such as principal pay down etc. But day 1( assuming a standard mortgage or something not weird like reverse) then that is your maximum loss into the property financially. And in my mind i was thinking more along the lines on commercial where your rents are covering your costs , paying down your principal etc.
I was just trying to make an observable point where increased debt does not necessarily mean increased risk. Arguments can be made that it does but I think its beneficial to know that it does always have to.
TXBullion wrote:I think ray always suggest it also, i myself am a fan of the strategy, pre buying/paying items you will end up using anyways . Like batteries, razors, toilet paper ( if you think the price will be higher in the coming years instead of now
Engineer wrote:TXBullion wrote:I think ray always suggest it also, i myself am a fan of the strategy, pre buying/paying items you will end up using anyways . Like batteries, razors, toilet paper ( if you think the price will be higher in the coming years instead of now
+1.7
My wife rolled her eyes when I ordered ten pairs of my favorite sneakers...until they discontinued the type she liked. I still have 4 years worth at $40/pr while she's buying the new and improved version at $60.
TXBullion wrote:I think ray always suggest it also, i myself am a fan of the strategy, pre buying/paying items you will end up using anyways . Like batteries, razors, toilet paper ( if you think the price will be higher in the coming years instead of now
Engineer wrote:My wife rolled her eyes when I ordered ten pairs of my favorite sneakers...until they discontinued the type she liked. I still have 4 years worth at $40/pr while she's buying the new and improved version at $60.
TXBullion wrote:Ha!!! thats too funny. Just am finishing up shoe pair number 4 or 5 from a buy several years ago I someone how seem to destroy shoes
TXBullion wrote:Engineer wrote:TXBullion wrote:I think ray always suggest it also, i myself am a fan of the strategy, pre buying/paying items you will end up using anyways . Like batteries, razors, toilet paper ( if you think the price will be higher in the coming years instead of now
+1.7
My wife rolled her eyes when I ordered ten pairs of my favorite sneakers...until they discontinued the type she liked. I still have 4 years worth at $40/pr while she's buying the new and improved version at $60.
Ha!!! thats too funny. Just am finishing up shoe pair number 4 or 5 from a buy several years ago I someone how seem to destroy shoes
NHsorter wrote:Ron Paul is in the news saying there is a dollar bubble. Stackers already know this, but when I saw the article, it did make we wonder what you guys think. What is the best way to prepare for, or the best places to store "wealth" in anticipation of a dollar crash? I get it, no one knows what a dollar crash would mean exactly. But who will come out the least damaged on the flip side? Those holding PM's? Those holding Euros? Those holding stock in certain companies?
(I put "wealth" in quotes because the word can imply an abundance of money, which is misleading in my situation. Basically all of my "wealth" was just transferred to the United States Treasury)
Not saying that I am fearing an impending currency crisis. TPTB are clearly elite can-kickers! So as plausible as it may be, I'm not holding my breath either way. And lets please try to steer clear of collapse of society on this currency crisis exercise. Of course I won't ever rule out the possibility of TSHTF, but for purposes of this thread I would like to try to stick to things other than ammo, nips, tampons and Twinkies if we can help it.
Return to Economic & Business News, Reports, and Predictions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests