neilgin1 wrote:I apologize for taking this thread off topic.
some of the above posts, I would dearly love to discuss, but unveiling my view of the current situation this nation is in, wouldn't be fruitful, nor would it be germane to the onus of this section.
I will try very very hard in the future NOT to go off topic, n.
plus1hdcp wrote:neilgin1 wrote:I apologize for taking this thread off topic.
some of the above posts, I would dearly love to discuss, but unveiling my view of the current situation this nation is in, wouldn't be fruitful, nor would it be germane to the onus of this section.
I will try very very hard in the future NOT to go off topic, n.
Off topic or not, I enjoyed reading your sidebar.
Treetop wrote:The mindset portrayed here will ensure the nations future is failure every bit as much as the entitlement minded. History shows us clearly complex cultures have trouble adapting through abrupt change. Food being the biggest issue. Ive been told I was an idealist on here before by people who would let their ideals allow most of the nation to starve to death if the choice was theirs.
neilgin1 wrote:Treetop wrote:The mindset portrayed here will ensure the nations future is failure every bit as much as the entitlement minded. History shows us clearly complex cultures have trouble adapting through abrupt change. Food being the biggest issue. Ive been told I was an idealist on here before by people who would let their ideals allow most of the nation to starve to death if the choice was theirs.
whoa!....Tree, whats that?.....you're assuming what my worldview is, at least that's the way it seems, if that post was directed at me.
Brother, I have lovingly given away more food to the hungry than you could imagine....and I spent a lot of my own childhood hungry, and ill clothed, so right now i'm fighting the emotion of being cross with you.....I fight I shall win....coz love conquers all. n.
aloneibreak wrote:neilgin1 wrote:Treetop wrote:The mindset portrayed here will ensure the nations future is failure every bit as much as the entitlement minded. History shows us clearly complex cultures have trouble adapting through abrupt change. Food being the biggest issue. Ive been told I was an idealist on here before by people who would let their ideals allow most of the nation to starve to death if the choice was theirs.
whoa!....Tree, whats that?.....you're assuming what my worldview is, at least that's the way it seems, if that post was directed at me.
Brother, I have lovingly given away more food to the hungry than you could imagine....and I spent a lot of my own childhood hungry, and ill clothed, so right now i'm fighting the emotion of being cross with you.....I fight I shall win....coz love conquers all. n.
directed more at me I assume...
I sincerely hope, zac, that in the case of a major food shortage, people would come together as you say and help support each other
and I've helped countless people with food, money, labor, time etc...
all of who were genuinely struggling even sometimes due to their own poor choices
but I'll stand by my view that people who REFUSE to work shouldn't eat off the hard work of others
I know I'm not alone in that viewpoint
Treetop wrote:
Meant both of you, neil is the one who has called me an idealist in some long past post. Also the one who first brought up NDAA and said "and all the fly over states that produce the food of this nation, are just going to roll over and say "yes massa", when the gummit comes to grab?" Which is designed to attempt to ensure we have food as a nation through major emergencies that would otherwise halt or thwart largescale food production. As someone who is decently well read in history and food production I find it one of the few desirable laws we have made past the constitution. abrupt changes put complex cultures on their knees mainly because of food. We live in an age an EMP and several other things could do just that. without such a plan how much food would there be for the next season assuming we got no outside help? enough for 10% of our 300million? 5%? We had a variation of this law throughout the whole cold war, for good reason. Gee maybe every man for himself is better and history shows us that would then include the starving military folks whom still had the past states weapons of war turned onto those who still managed to eat anyway, gee maybe that would be better.
Treetop wrote: <snip> History shows us clearly complex cultures have trouble adapting through abrupt change. Food being the biggest issue.<snip>
aloneibreak wrote:i really feel that the DURATION of this low, rather than cost per ounce will determine when the 90% shortage rights itself
folks say theyre not selling, but come black friday/christmastime if prices are still suppressed , i believe there'll be silver hitting the market again
beauanderos wrote:How many of us will continue to stack if prices remain sideways for another four years?
neilgin1 wrote:beauanderos wrote:Now, old dependable... Provident Metals has run out of ninety percent junk as well. They only have Walker halves in stock and want 15.95X for a roll
http://www.providentmetals.com/bullion/silver/us-slv/90-slv.html
I operate under the "four legged chair" theory.......meaning you got to cover the three "B's" (beans bullets band-aids) PLUS the stack.
Recyclersteve wrote:neilgin1 wrote:
I operate under the "four legged chair" theory.......meaning you got to cover the three "B's" (beans bullets band-aids) PLUS the stack.
If three of the legs are beans, bullets and bandaids, is the fourth one bullion?
beauanderos wrote:TXBullion wrote:I still have some 90% that I think is 24xface but some its most full weight or au / bu coin with some older date. Not very much but I would prefer not to part with it under any price , well maybe would start considering 100 FV IF I could find a relatively better place I felt I could put the money to use at that time.
I will trickle sell some into the market at much higher prices, but only to eliminate any remaining debt that I might still have. If you see me post a sale, it only means I'm rebalancing my stack in some fashion.
Recyclersteve wrote:neilgin1 wrote:beauanderos wrote:Now, old dependable... Provident Metals has run out of ninety percent junk as well. They only have Walker halves in stock and want 15.95X for a roll
http://www.providentmetals.com/bullion/silver/us-slv/90-slv.html
I operate under the "four legged chair" theory.......meaning you got to cover the three "B's" (beans bullets band-aids) PLUS the stack.
If three of the legs are beans, bullets and bandaids, is the fourth one bullion?
scyther wrote:I said $20. Why? Because 90% isn't safe. Too much of it is fake. I'd rather have something direct from the mint, in its original tube, bought the same year it was made (so there was less time to make fakes of it) that I know (with as high degree of certainty as possible) doesn't come from a factory in China. Junk silver is a really nice idea, but sadly I don't think it's a smart way to buy silver these days.
I have very little silver compared to most people here (less than some of you buy per week) so I don't have a good reason to sell... I just hold and wait... but if prices went up a good bit, I'd absolutely unload some junk I'm less than fully confident in.
Doctor Steuss wrote:Nice little Cliff Notes version of current 90% premiums:
http://www.junksilverbook.com/?p=37
Return to Silver Bullion, Gold, & other Bullion Metals
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests