Recyclersteve wrote:It's a good thing the mintmarks are on the obverse! I would think the good folks at Whitman would have lobbied the U.S. Mint to try and have all mintmarks be on the observes. Even holders where you can see the obverse and reverse both don't suffice. It is better to be able to see both date and mintmark at the same time.
The mints finally figured it out, but it sure took a long time. I remember having to look to the right of Monticello on the reverse for the mintmark on nickels. Or above the dome of Monticello for the war years.
If I ran the mint back in the day, that would have been one of the first things I changed.
Mint Director- recyclersteve- nah, that doesn't sound right!
Recyclersteve wrote:I'm gonna guess the first hole filled will be the 1936.
Recyclersteve wrote:1929?
Many are missing from the 1927-39 section of course, but I managed to fill 27, 27-D, 29, 30, 35, 36, & 37
sparechange wrote:My guess--1950S..
fasteddy wrote:coindood, good idea. We are going out to our west TX property this weekend with the grandchild...I will take a few containers of my found wheats and pick up some whitmans to give us something to do if the weather is inclement. Better than watching videos!
hobo finds wrote:I will say 1938
coindood wrote:... can't beat a mere two days between finds. Let's hope that trend continues.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests