hejira11 wrote: I also believe NO ONE holds .999 silver by accident.
Mossy wrote:hejira11 wrote: I also believe NO ONE holds .999 silver by accident.
"No one" is sort of drastic. The number of accidentals is certainly small enough to ignore.
avidbrandy wrote:What defines a serious investor? I'd say it's a percentage of the investments in metal, not a flat amount. To say "you must have $400,000 in silver to be a 'serious investor' is rather absurd. I'd say anyone who has over 50% of their investments in precious metals is a serious investor.
beauanderos wrote:I say compare "significant" to what is always touted as the route to retirement, the old adage of contribute $2000 every year for your work career and expect 8 percent compounded interest and you should have sufficient savings to fund your retirement (figures vary between one and two million). Forgettting about the compounding element, and utilzing a baseline of $50 silver anyone who was keeping up with or exceeding the target provided thus is doing quite well for themselves.
18 = 40 oz
19 = 80 oz
20 = 120 oz
25 = 320 oz
30 = 520 oz
35 = 720 oz
40 = 920 oz
45 = 1120 oz
50 = 1320 oz
55 = 1520 oz
60 = 1720 oz
I would much rather amass an equivalent value of silver outside a system designed by the govt and which can be confiscated by them, than depend on those assets being available to be withdrawn when you need them. The compounding 8% is laughable. My brokerage tells me that the avg amount baby boomers have saved towards retirement is less than $70,000... which in the event of hyperinflation would not last you a year. Something like 56% have less than $10,000 saved.
Rodebaugh wrote:So Rays chart is nice for full silver vestment......but what about gold. You know....that yellow metal.
Buy and hold an ounce per year for the average incomer?
beauanderos wrote:Rodebaugh wrote:So Rays chart is nice for full silver vestment......but what about gold. You know....that yellow metal.
Buy and hold an ounce per year for the average incomer?
Well, if you remember the $2000 cap than you'll start exceeding that by next year if you wanted an ounce a year. But that's as good a number as any. Got your ten ounces yet, youngster? That earlier chart I posted is much less than what would be ideal, as it doesn't track the element of compounding... but you get the idea. Gives people a target... but certainly, don't stop there. Dang, I just realized... you guys could be calling me Methusaleh and get away with it
theo wrote:When I used the term "significant" I was thinking of an amount that would probably have to be willfully accumulated by an investor/stacker with some combination of resources and discipline.
fasTT wrote:How about 1 comex contract.
That seems to be a reasonable number for significant/serious.
100 oz. gold or 5000 oz. silver.
Mike wrote: Over the past 33 years working, I've known exactly one other PM investor. Recently two acquaintances have talked about it, but I don't know if it was just talk, or if they've actually done anything about it.
adagirl wrote:My vote is that anyone who consistently buys silver is "serious." What constitutes significant (or for that matter, serious) is subjective until the zeitgeist operational defines the terms. Perhaps a "signficant" holding of PM's would be a defined % of one's net worth or purchasing power.
beauanderos wrote:
I would much rather amass an equivalent value of silver outside a system designed by the govt and which can be confiscated by them, than depend on those assets being available to be withdrawn when you need them. The compounding 8% is laughable. My brokerage tells me that the avg amount baby boomers have saved towards retirement is less than $70,000... which in the event of hyperinflation would not last you a year. Something like 56% have less than $10,000 saved.
Return to Silver Bullion, Gold, & other Bullion Metals
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests