Sheikh_yer_Bu'Tay wrote:Back in the good old days when we all followed the US Constitution... this would have been easily declared un-constitutional.
Now, who knows? Does anyone have $50,000 to $100,000 to take this onerous anti-garage sale law all the way to the US Supreme Court?
barrytrot wrote:Sheikh_yer_Bu'Tay wrote:Back in the good old days when we all followed the US Constitution... this would have been easily declared un-constitutional.
Now, who knows? Does anyone have $50,000 to $100,000 to take this onerous anti-garage sale law all the way to the US Supreme Court?
For what reason? Do you know how long it takes to get to the Supreme Court? By then Obama's second term will likely make all cash transactions illegal by Constitutional amendment.
Thogey wrote:Since the 1099 requirement of the Obama Care was rescinded, this will be the most ignored law in the USA.
Maybe second to smokin pot. We should all enjoy ignoring stupid laws.
I hope my good friend beau experiences great joy ignoring this one.
Sheikh_yer_Bu'Tay wrote:For what reason? Barry, I am a little confused here by what you mean. The reason is to return our finances back to Constitutional legitimacy. This is clearly un-Constitutional, no?
Most citizens will just cow-tow to the law than fight it. It costs too much.
U.S. Constitution, Article One, Section 10: "No state shall enter into any treaty, alliance, or confederation; grant letters of marque and reprisal; coin money; emit bills of credit; make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts; pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts, or grant any title of nobility."
This Louisiana law prohibits the use of money coined by the U.S. Mint for certain purchases. When you make a garage sale purchase, you are entering into a verbal contract to exchange value, same for same. If the price is $50.00 for a set of silverware, your obligation is to pay $50 for the silverware. This law prohibits you doing so.
It is really a good example of how far we have fallen from Liberty. The Congress stopped the Mint from coining lawful money decades ago. Without lawful money available to the citizenry, this is all moot. If Obama wins a second term, God help us!
Sheikh_yer_Bu'Tay wrote:Thogey wrote:Since the 1099 requirement of the Obama Care was rescinded, this will be the most ignored law in the USA.
Maybe second to smokin pot. We should all enjoy ignoring stupid laws.
I hope my good friend beau experiences great joy ignoring this one.
I can't remember what organization made this statement, but it has been said that the average citizen breaks an average of five laws a day and doesn't even know it. I hear ya, Thogey.
This one will be hard to ignore if second hand retailers have people breathing down their necks on enforcement.
What if the buyer does not have anything but cash to pay for their debts? There are many people out there without bank accounts and credit cards. What are they suppose to do?
barrytrot wrote:Sheikh_yer_Bu'Tay wrote:For what reason? Barry, I am a little confused here by what you mean. The reason is to return our finances back to Constitutional legitimacy. This is clearly un-Constitutional, no?
Most citizens will just cow-tow to the law than fight it. It costs too much.
U.S. Constitution, Article One, Section 10: "No state shall enter into any treaty, alliance, or confederation; grant letters of marque and reprisal; coin money; emit bills of credit; make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts; pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts, or grant any title of nobility."
This Louisiana law prohibits the use of money coined by the U.S. Mint for certain purchases. When you make a garage sale purchase, you are entering into a verbal contract to exchange value, same for same. If the price is $50.00 for a set of silverware, your obligation is to pay $50 for the silverware. This law prohibits you doing so.
It is really a good example of how far we have fallen from Liberty. The Congress stopped the Mint from coining lawful money decades ago. Without lawful money available to the citizenry, this is all moot. If Obama wins a second term, God help us!
I said "for what reason" because it is a *pointless excercise*. Someone would have to spend YEARS of their valuable time fighting an *un-winnable war*.
You think this is the last of these type changes? Nope. Many more will follow.
Fighting this to the "Supreme Court" (which is a political enterprise also) is pointless. It takes YEARS to get there if you even do as they have to accept your case.
And by that time there will be far more things exactly like this in place.
If it were winnable I would say it's worth the multi-year fight. But it is not winnable.
Return to Economic & Business News, Reports, and Predictions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests